WHAT A DIFFERENCE A DAY MAKES

Boy, was I wrong when I said not much was going on. Today exploded with action on the regulatory front all of which stank.
First, The Leader and his boys let it drop that they were trying to figure out ways to insure that the American Taxpayer gets all of his money from TARP back. Of course they couldn't give a damn about the taxpayer but here presented itself another way to lay a tax on the banks which they believe no one in the country cares about anyway. These guys are like Willie Sutton , who wen asked why he robbed banks replied,"Because that's where the money is." Actually, they are worse than Willie; he didn't lie about his reasons.

Anyway, what we have seen is that almost all the "banks" have repaid their TARP funds, with interest and with an additional healthy return generated for the USG by way of the sale of the warrants that were part of the deal. But it would appear that there might be a few problems along the way because if one remembers, a whole bunch of taxpayer money went to GM (now owned by the Gov.), GMAC, Chrysler, Chrysler Financial and AIG. That aint comin' back soon. Then of course there is the little matter of Fanny and Freddie, the makers of the feast about whom we have spoken ad nauseam over the months. So why tax the banks for the decision to bail out this bunch? Think Willie Sutton. Actually, if the actions of the Government were to be viewed from the prospectus of Cui Bono, why not tax the United Auto Workers? How far do you think that idea would get? Or better yet, is there a way to garnish the salaries of Congress? Just a little midwest populist jibe there, don't take me seriously. I'm a little past my "use by" date, but in my lifetime I have never seen a more venial, useless bunch than has been put together by The Leader and his handlers. These guys are the worst.

Well, let me rethink that. Came today Shelia ("Poo") Bair, head of the FDIC with another idea. With a split vote, the FDIC is now proposing a tiered level of deposit insurance to be paid by banks based upon the perception of risk that SOMEBODY will determine exists on the banks' balance sheets. To put it another way, she is proposing to tax liabilities (she claims it's not a tax) according to some credit determination made by SOMEBODY (you see, she doesn't have nearly the talent in house) at some point for some non-defined period of time. This is a Bair of very little brain. When questioned about this on TV this morning she was unable to come close to explaining her theory behind this. Nor has she apparently considered the fact that the cost of this hair brained scheme will be passed right through to the consumer depositors in the form of either lower interest payments, additional fees, reductions of service or all of the above including a few other delicious charges all of which will be blamed on the FDIC. Nor has she considered the fact that the two biggest risk takers, Goldie and Morgan Stanley have little if any consumer deposits but as bank holding companies they now come under the FDIC umbrella and the implied protection that that brings. If there is a X rated version of "Dumb and Dumber," she should be the star.

Finally, it now appears that Helicopter Ben may well be back in trouble as to his re-confirmation. He deserves it, the jerk, and on top of it all he is now in a nasty little open-air brawl with John Taylor, now of Stanford over the "Taylor Rule" which the good prof feels Mr. Bernanke has deliberately mis-catorgorized. Academics at each other's throats!! Hide the Children! I could care less if the Chairman gets himself into this little brawls except that it does no good for his institution in these times. Somebody had better start standing up for the only group of people who actually know what the hell is going on out there otherwise we are heading for a real mess if not catastrophy .